Mobile Comparisons For You
Compare From
🛈 Please Enter Model Name to Compare
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Xiaomi 15T Pro

RS 239,999

Compare With
🛈 Please Enter Model Name to Compare
Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi 15S Pro

RS 383,999

Display
Display Type
IPS LCD
LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 3200 nits (peak)
Dimensions
N/A
161.3 x 75.3 x 8.3 mm (6.35 x 2.96 x 0.33 in)
Resolution
1440 x 3200 pixels
1440 x 3200 pixels
Weight
N/A
216 g (7.62 oz)
Colors
Various
Black, Blue
Size
6.36 inches
6.73 inches
Protection
Unspecified
Unspecified
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Memory
Card slot
MicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
MicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
RAM
16 GB RAM
16GB RAM
Storage
512 GB Built-in
512GB, 1TB Built-in
Camera
Front Camera
32 MP
32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm
Features
LED flash, HDR, panorama
Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Back Camera
50 MP
50 MP, f/1.4, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF
Network
2G Network
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
3G Network
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G Network
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900)
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900)
OS
OS
Android 15, HyperOS 2
Android 15, HyperOS 2
Chipset
Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)
Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)
CPU
Octa-core
Octa-core
Battery
Battery Type
(Non removable) 4610 mAh
Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh
Connectivity
Wi-fi Hotspot
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Bluetooth
V5.4 with A2DP, LE
V5.4 with A2DP, LE
USB
USB Type-C 2.0
USB Type-C 2.0
Price
Price in Pak
239,999
383,999
Disclaimer: We can not guarantee that all the details regarding this comparison is 100% correct.