Mobile Comparisons For You
Compare From
🛈 Please Enter Model Name to Compare
Vivo X Fold 4 Pro
Vivo X Fold 4 Pro

RS 297,999

Compare With
🛈 Please Enter Model Name to Compare
Samsung A05s
Samsung A05s

RS 38,499

Display
Display Type
Foldable OLED
PLS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen, 16M Colors, Multitouch
Dimensions
N/A
168 x 77.8 x 8.8 mm
Resolution
2200 x 2480 pixels
1080 x 2400 Pixels (~393 PPI)
Weight
N/A
194 g
Colors
Black
Black, Silver, Light Green, Violet
Size
8.03 inches
6.7 Inches
Protection
Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)
Accelerometer, Fingerprint (side-mounted), Proximity
Extra Features
120Hz, HDR10+
-
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
-
Memory
Card slot
MicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
MicroSD Card, (supports up to 1TB)
RAM
12GB RAM
-
Storage
256GB Built-in
-
Camera
Front Camera
32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
13 MP
Features
Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR, Video (1080p@30/60fps)
Back Camera
50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
Network
2G Network
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G Network
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G Network
LTE
LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500)
5G Networks
SA/NSA
No
OS
OS
Android 15
Android 13 OS
UI
FuntouchOS 14
Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
Chipset
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm)
Octa-core (4 x 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold + 4 x 1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
CPU
Octa-core
-
Battery
Battery Type
(Li-ion Non removable) 6000 mAh
(Li-Po Non removable), 5000 mAh
Connectivity
Wi-fi Hotspot
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth
5.4 with A2DP, LE
V5.1 with A2DP, LE
USB
USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
USB Type-C 2.0
Price
Price in Pak
297,999
38,499
Disclaimer: We can not guarantee that all the details regarding this comparison is 100% correct.