Mobile Comparisons For You
Compare From
🛈 Please Enter Model Name to Compare
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16

RS 380,499

Compare With
🛈 Please Enter Model Name to Compare
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Meizu Note 16 Pro

RS 62,200

Display
Display Type
Super Retina XDR OLED Touchscreen
OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (peak), 4500 nits (peak)
Dimensions
147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8 mm
163.8 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in)
Resolution
1179 x 2556 Pixels (~461 PPI)
1224 x 2720 pixels
Weight
170 g
197.5 g
Colors
Black, White, Pink, Teal, Ultramarine
Gray, Blue, White
Size
6.1 Inches
6.78 inches
Protection
Ceramic Shield glass 2024 gen
Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Extra Features
HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM)
90Hz, 800 nits
Sensors
Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Face ID, Gyro, Proximity, Ultra Wideband (UWB) support (gen2 chip). Emergency SOS, Messages and Find My via satellite
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Memory
Card slot
No
MicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Camera
Front Camera
12 Mp
8 MP, (wide)
Features
(Li-ion Non removable), 3561 mAh
LED flash, HDR, panorama
Back Camera
48 Mp
50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4
Network
2G Network
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
3G Network
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G Network
LTE
LTE
5G Networks
SA/NSA/Sub6
SA/NSA
OS
OS
IOS 18
Flyme AIOS 2
Chipset
Apple A18 (3 nm)
Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU
Hexa-core (2 x 4.04 GHz + 4 x 2.20 GHz)
Octa-core
Battery
Battery Type
(Li-ion Non removable)
(Non removable) 6200 mAh
Wireless Charging
Wireless (Qi2)
80W wired, QC4+, PD3.0, PPS
Fast Charging
Yes
-
Connectivity
Wi-fi Hotspot
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, hotspot
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Bluetooth
V5.3 with A2DP, LE
V5.3 with A2DP, LE
USB
USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Price
Price in Pak
380,499
62,200
Price in Usa
$1321.18
-
Disclaimer: We can not guarantee that all the details regarding this comparison is 100% correct.